Humans have never dealt with mass extinction
Mass extinctions are rare events but there are clear signs another one is on the way. To be blunt, things are not looking good for life on Earth.
The last mass extinction happened 150 million years ago, during the Cretaceous period, when dinosaurs and other large animals lived on Earth. Bad for the dinos, good for the mammals, from whom we evolved.
Humans have learned to solve many problems like building bridges and roads, transplanting organs, and curing many diseases. When a new virus appears millions of people die. New threats, the deadly unknown “novel” challenges are difficult to imagine and are easy to ignore.
The upside
Experts say we still have a chance to avoid a tipping point if we are willing to change. Consider the amazing accomplishments and the dreams of the human race, from the distant past, to the present, to the amazing potential of the future. How can we just give up without even trying? How can we ignore the art, science, music, and all other human creations? We need true effective solutions, climate warriors, and peacemakers.
Respecting nature and all people
In only nine years we need to cut carbon dioxide emissions by at least half. The challenge is not only about carbon dioxide, we need to learn to work together during severe weather and a worldwide pandemic. We are facing hate, racism, and environmental injustice, where poor countries and minorities are at higher risk.
“Combating climate change—it’s not optional. It’s essential,” EPA Administrator Michael Regan said. To change the world, everyone needs to change. Compassion, care, peace, love, and good community behavior are essential.
Tipping points
Due to its size and composition, the Earth changes very slowly, until it reaches a tipping point. A tipping point is a very fast irreversible change. This is happening in the atmosphere from the carbon emissions created by burning forests and fossil fuels for the last 120 years.
Strategic forest carbon reserves
Protecting forests is an essential strategy. Trees capture and store massive amounts of carbon, as long as we keep them in the forests. When they die, old trees decompose and feed the forest soil. Forests are proven carbon sinks.
Dr. Moomaw, an expert ecologist and recognized climate expert is the father of “proforestation.” His team has suggested creating strategic forest carbon reserves, with selected forests to be protected in perpetuity.
Moomaw says, “Forests pull about one-third of all human-caused carbon dioxide emissions from the atmosphere each year. Researchers have calculated that ending deforestation and allowing mature forests to keep growing could enable forests to take up twice as much carbon. Half of a tree’s stems, branches, and roots are composed of carbon. Live and dead trees, along with forest soil, hold the equivalent of 80% of all the carbon currently in Earth’s atmosphere. Mature trees that have reached full root, bark and canopy development deal with climate variability better than young trees. Older trees also store more carbon. Old-growth trees, which usually are hundreds of years old, store enormous quantities of carbon in their wood, and accumulate more carbon annually.”
Burning forests must stop
Burning forests for electricity is a false climate change solution. Drax is the top burner, but South Korea and Japan are subsidizing the use of biomass power so heavily that it’s hindering the adoption of clean energy technologies like solar and wind.
Europe is a major growth region for biomass energy, where 65 percent of EU “renewable” energy comes from burning forests. The Finnish Prime Minister is lobbying the EU Commission to allow even more trees to be burned.
Twitter campaign
Let’s stop Drax’s deception and abuse by sharing the Arkansas air pollution violations with the COP26 organizers. Suggested tweet: “Burning forests destroys the carbon sink and releases all the stored carbon in the forests. Biomass is a false climate change solution unworthy of public subsidies.”
Here are the COP26 twitter accounts, @EU_Commission, @FinGovernment, @COP26, @COP26_Coalition, @theGCF, @BorisJohnson, @AlokSharma_RDG, @topnigel @Ggow_COP.
Dr. Luis Contreras
Here is an open letter to world leaders … asking to face the climate emergency
https://climateemergencyeu.org
Unprecedented Crime: Climate Science Denial And Game Changers For Survival – is a great book that reads like a UN science team jointly making a life-and-death 911 call recording to a planet of primed and waiting emergency responders: “We’ve hit bottom. The situation is dire.
Time is short. Ignore the criminal deniers, bankers, media and politicians! We need to urgently mobilize millions now!”
https://mahb.stanford.edu/blog/unprecedented-crime-review/
Here is a good reference on forest carbon
Undisturbed forests are crucial for a healthy climate, continuously taking carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in trees, shrubs and soil. But logging can transform a swath of forest from a carbon “sink” into a carbon source, not only destroying CO2-absorbing trees but emitting tons of new greenhouse gases in the process. Clearcutting — the most CO2-spewing logging method of them all — is meanwhile devastating to wildlife, habitat and water quality.
Law requires state agencies to consider and counter greenhouse gas emissions from all projects before those projects are approved. But some agencies don’t always follow the law. Notably, in summer 2009 the California Department of Forestry failed to carry out any project-specific analysis of the emissions that would come from clearcutting projects it approved for logging giant Sierra Pacific Industries. So the Center stepped in to uphold environmental laws in court.
https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/public_lands/forests/clearcutting_and_climate_change/
You may remember the One Trillion Tree initiative?
Do you know how many trees the US has planted, please call Rep. Bruce Westerman, (202) 225-3772,
https://westerman.house.gov
Westerman says, “Despite incredible improvements in technology, trees are still the most large-scale, cost-effective and environmentally-friendly carbon sequestration devices we have. Growing more trees to pull carbon from the atmosphere, scientifically managing our forests to mitigate catastrophic wildfires, and incentivizing the use of wood products as renewable resources provides a comprehensive, practical solution to the climate issues we’re facing today.”
The first half is true, forests are awesome, old-growth forests are the best carbon sink
The second half is false. Trees do not cause wildfires, you may have seen pictures of standing trees near melted asphalt and cars.
Logging forests using commercial equipment to clearcut as quickly as possible destroys the carbon in the soil and the fungi connecting the trees with the Mother trees.
https://westerman.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/westerman-leads-bipartisan-introduction-trillion-trees-act/
The most important solutions are often overlooked: Keeping trees in the ground where they are already growing is an effective low-tech way to slow climate change
https://theconversation.com/keeping-trees-in-the-ground-where-they-are-already-growing-is-an-effective-low-tech-way-to-slow-climate-change-154618